蚁人
跑步被绊倒扭伤：怪“路”，还是怪“人”？_我的网站
A |
As foreign ministers and senior representatives from Pacific nations convened in Suva for the Pacific Islands Forum (PIF) to discuss key regional issues, New Zealand's foreign minister reportedly pushed to secure a joint statement condemning China's missile tests in July, however, his effort ultimately fell flat. A Chinese expert described the outcome as a clear rebuke to Canberra and Wellington's ingrained habit of speaking for the Pacific, saying the two countries must come to terms with a shifting reality: Pacific Island states are increasingly unwilling to let Australia and New Zealand dictate who their friends, foes and perceived security threats should be.
Pacific Island foreign ministers failed to agree on Friday to a joint response to China's missile launch in July, with further discussions expected at the Pacific leaders meeting at the end of August, said New Zealand Foreign Minister Winston Peters, according to Reuters.
According to a report from Radio New Zealand, there has not been a unanimous statement from Pacific nations about China's test-launch in July, and Peters said New Zealand had been pushing for one. Peters claimed that the Pacific missed an opportunity not to issue a joint statement soon after China's launch.
Australia's Foreign Minister Penny Wong said before the meeting that she hoped China took note of the "very clear response" already sent from the Pacific about the test, according to AFP.
Peters' push for a joint PIF statement on China's missile tests, together with Wong's remarks, are less about technical security concerns than an effort to turn their own anxieties about China into a regional agenda and pressure Beijing under the forum's collective banner. His description of Pacific Island countries' refusal to single out China as a "missed opportunity" also reveals little respect for their independent judgment, Chen Hong, director of the New Zealand Studies Centre, East China Normal University, told the Global Times.
The result is a clear rebuke to Canberra and Wellington's long-standing habit of arrogantly "speaking for" the Pacific, as island states are increasingly unwilling to let Australia and New Zealand decide who their friends, foes or security threats should be, said Chen Hong.
The Chinese People's Liberation Army Navy said on July 6 that one of its strategic nuclear submarines successfully launched a strategic missile toward relevant high seas of the Pacific Ocean, which landed precisely within the designated waters. China notified relevant countries in advance of the test launch, a move that demonstrates the openness and transparency of the Chinese armed forces, Chen Xi, a spokesperson for the Ministry of National Defense, said at a press conference on July 7.
Chen Hong also noted that Peters' recent China-related rhetoric has become increasingly populist and hawkish as elections approach in New Zealand. "Such an approach risks undermining New Zealand's long-standing reputation for pragmatic, independent, and rational diplomacy," Chen Hong said.
In July, during a parliamentary debate on New Zealand's Covid-19 pandemic response, Peters, who is also leader of the populist New Zealand First party, told a Chinese-born lawmaker to "go back to your own country" while mocking his English proficiency. His remarks drew wide criticism in New Zealand.
Yet Australia and New Zealand continued to amplify missile-related issues and great-power rivalry, pushing the "China threat" narrative to the center of the regional agenda while sidelining the priorities that matter most to Pacific Island nations, said Chinese analysts.
Chen Hong noted that for island states, the most urgent concerns are not geopolitical competition but everyday challenges: climate change, energy security, development financing, infrastructure and economic resilience. By shifting the focus from these concerns to strategic rivalry among major powers, Australia and New Zealand risk distorting the region's real priorities and undermining the aspirations of Pacific Island countries.
According to an introduction on the forum website, "The Forum's Pacific Vision is for a resilient region of peace, harmony, security, social inclusion and prosperity, so that all Pacific people can lead free, healthy, and productive lives."
At the opening of the meeting, Rick Houenipwela, foreign minister of the Solomon Islands and chair of the meeting, said that the Pacific's agenda must continue to be "conceived by the Pacific, shaped by the Pacific and only by the Pacific," according to Reuters.
Chen Hong said Pacific Island nations have made their position clear: differences with China do not mean signing up to the strategic agendas of Australia and New Zealand. A growing number of island countries refuse to be trapped in the black-and-white binary choice of siding with either China or the West.
If Canberra and Wellington keep pushing rhetoric beyond the regional consensus, they risk undermining the very institution they claim to support. The PIF's strength lies not in issuing confrontational statements, but in preserving Pacific unity. Turning that consensus into a tool for pressuring China would erode the forum's cohesion and weaken its central role in the region, said Chen Hong.
。
上周，有个朋友早上跑步绊倒了，膝盖被磕破了，脚踝也扭伤了，肿的像个馒头。在医院简单处理后，让回家休养，已经过去五天了，还不能跑步。他绊倒的原因，是公园的塑胶跑道上鼓起了一个大包，据说很多在这里跑步的人，都曾被都绊过。这事，到底是怪路维护不及时？还是怪人不小心？
。三个问号第一，跑道为什么会出现质量问题？跑道拱起变形，施工有问题？跑道的基层处理不到位，路基压实度不足，雨天积水渗入底层，跑道表层就会鼓起开裂。再加上夏季高温暴晒，塑胶面层热胀形变，边缘鼓起、接口起翘，确实容易变形。第二，为什么长期无人维修？出问题不是最可怕的，最可怕的是出了问题没人管。跑道拱起变形显然不是一天两天的事，但长期无人过问，直到有人因此受伤。第三，为什么不设警示牌？哪怕修不了，至少立个牌子、拉个警戒线，提醒跑者绕行。什么都没有。公园跑道本来是“惠民工程”，可不能变成“害民工程”。普遍现象有人可能会说：“就一条跑道出了问题，至于大惊小怪吗？”还真不是个例。今年7月，河南某地新区体育场某湖旁边的跑步道，路面维护留下凸出的大钉，导致一名孩子跑步时摔伤。某地体育公园天桥路面破损严重，“从建设投用没几天就路面破损”，被市民称为“豆腐渣工程”。
B | 还有某县花了520万元改造的体育场，刚完工试用阶段塑胶跑道就出现多处开胶、表层脱落，踩踏后底层材料外露。当地网友拍下视频，跑道像被撕开了一道道口子。
C | 修跑道是为了让人跑步，现在反倒让人摔跤——这钱花得冤不冤？该谁负责？从法律上讲，公园跑道的管理者，应该是城市管理的相关部门。
D | 《民法典》明确规定，公共场所的经营者、管理者未尽到安全保障义务，造成他人损害的，应当承担侵权责任。公园跑道出现安全隐患，管理者应当设置警示标志并及时维修。不修、不警示、不处理，出了事就要担责。今年7月，北京房山区一个公园的座椅老化失修导致老人摔伤，法院就认定公园管理方未尽到安全保障义务，判决承担赔偿责任。
E | 这不是“你倒霉”的问题，这是管理者的责任问题。跑者怎么办？作为普通跑者，我们能做什么？第一，跑的时候多留个心眼。夜跑时注意脚下，尤其是熟悉的路段反而最容易放松警惕。这次摔伤的跑者就是在自己常跑的公园出的事，最熟悉的地方，突发变化，往往也最危险。第二，发现问题及时反映。看到跑道破损、拱起、有异物，拍照发到本地政务平台或12345热线。早一天反应，可能就少一个人受伤。第三，受伤后保留证据维权。拍照、录像、留好就医记录。公共设施管理者有安全保障义务，该承担的责任不能让他们推掉。写在最后跑步是为了健康，不是为了受伤。
F | 一条好跑道，应该是跑者的“朋友”，而不是“陷阱”。
G | 修了跑道没人管，比不修更可怕。惠民工程，不能变成“害民工程”。跑者的安全，不该靠运气来保障。
Current article:http://50178.ruwentaqintiaozhupapaigai.shop/9c4yyb/hxoo80.html
Published on:19:33:31